Ayres v. Sweigart

6 Watts 191
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided May 15, 1837·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The agreement in evidence, has no feature of a recognizance. It is not in the form of one, being without penalty, condition, or acknowledgment. It is a mere stipulation, which acquired, from having been entered among the minutes of the docket, no quality of a debt of record, or no greater force than if it had been written on a loose slip of paper. In what form it might warrant a recovery, is not at present an inquiry; it is sufficient lor the occasion that it does not support the declaration.

Judgment reversed, and a venire de novo awarded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ayres v. Sweigart, 6 Watts 191 (Pa. 1837).

6 Watts 191 (Ayres v. Sweigart) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cleveland v. Carson
37 N.J. Eq. 377 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1883)