Ayre v. Maryland
419 U.S. 1073, 95 S. Ct. 664
Opinions
Crim. Ct. Baltimore City, Md. Certiorari denied. Mr. Justice Douglas, being of the view that any state or federal ban on, or regulation of, obscenity is prohibited by the Constitution, Roth v. United States, 354 U. S. 476, 508-514 (1957) (Douglas, J., dissenting); Miller v. California, 413 U. S. 15, 42-47 (1973) (Douglas, J., dissenting); Paris Adult [1074]*1074Theatre I v. Slaton, 413 U. S. 49, 70-73 (1973) (Douglas, J., dissenting), would grant certiorari and summarily reverse the judgment.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ayre v. Maryland, 419 U.S. 1073, 95 S. Ct. 664 (1974).
419 U.S. 1073 (Ayre v. Maryland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Roth v. United States
354 U.S. 476 (Supreme Court, 1957)
Miller v. California
413 U.S. 15 (Supreme Court, 1973)
Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton
413 U.S. 49 (Supreme Court, 1973)
Heller v. New York
413 U.S. 483 (Supreme Court, 1973)
Roaden v. Kentucky
413 U.S. 496 (Supreme Court, 1973)
Ebert v. Maryland State Board of Censors
313 A.2d 536 (Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, 1973)