Ayre v. Maryland

Supreme Court

Ayre v. Maryland

419 U.S. 1073, 95 S. Ct. 664

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedDecember 16, 1974

Docket73-2008

StatusPublished

This text of 419 U.S. 1073 (Ayre v. Maryland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ayre v. Maryland, 419 U.S. 1073, 95 S. Ct. 664 (1974).

Pincite

Opinions

Crim. Ct. Baltimore City, Md. Certiorari denied. Mr. Justice Douglas, being of the view that any state or federal ban on, or regulation of, obscenity is prohibited by the Constitution, Roth v. United States, 354 U. S. 476, 508-514 (1957) (Douglas, J., dissenting); Miller v. California, 413 U. S. 15, 42-47 (1973) (Douglas, J., dissenting); Paris Adult [1074]*1074Theatre I v. Slaton, 413 U. S. 49, 70-73 (1973) (Douglas, J., dissenting), would grant certiorari and summarily reverse the judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Crim. Ct. Baltimore City, Md. Certiorari denied. Mr. Justice Douglas, being of the view that any state or federal ban on, or regulation of, obscenity is prohibited by the Constitution, Roth v. United States, 354 U. S. 476, 508-514 (1957) (Douglas, J., dissenting); Miller v. California, 413 U. S. 15, 42-47 (1973) (Douglas, J., dissenting); Paris Adult [1074]*1074Theatre I v. Slaton, 413 U. S. 49, 70-73 (1973) (Douglas, J., dissenting), would grant certiorari and summarily reverse the judgment.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

419 U.S. 1073, 95 S. Ct. 664, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ayre-v-maryland-scotus-1974.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack