Ayoub v. Ayoub

New York Court of Appeals

Ayoub v. Ayoub

931 N.E.2d 94, 14 N.Y.3d 921, 905 N.Y.S.2d 125

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 15, 2010

Docket165 SSM 11

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 931 N.E.2d 94 (Ayoub v. Ayoub) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ayoub v. Ayoub, 931 N.E.2d 94, 14 N.Y.3d 921, 905 N.Y.S.2d 125 (N.Y. 2010).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), appeal dismissed, without costs. Under the circumstances of this case, the parties’ settlement agreement subsequent to the Appellate Division order rendered the appeal to this Court moot. We decline appellant’s request to invoke the mootness exception.

Concur: Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), appeal dismissed, without costs. Under the circumstances of this case, the parties’ settlement agreement subsequent to the Appellate Division order rendered the appeal to this Court moot. We decline appellant’s request to invoke the mootness exception.

Concur: Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

931 N.E.2d 94, 14 N.Y.3d 921, 905 N.Y.S.2d 125, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ayoub-v-ayoub-ny-2010.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack