Aymett, Julian v. Citibank South Dakota NA

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Aymett, Julian v. Citibank South Dakota NA. Read the opinion of the Court — 2013 Tex. App. LEXIS 4433 →

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided November 9, 2012·No. 05-11-00451-CV·Published

Opinion

Order Issued November 9, 2012

In The

No. 05-11-00451-CV

JULIAN AYMETT, Appellant

CITIBANK (SOUTH DAKOTA), N.A., Appellee

On Appeal from the 162nd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 10-04983-I

ORDER The Court has before it appellee Citibank (South Dakota), N.A.’s November 9, 2012

unopposed motion to reset oral argument scheduled for 9:00 a.m., November 13, 2012. The Court

GRANTS the motion to reset oral argument. The appeal will be rescheduled in due course for

submission, and the parties will be notified of the resetting.

ROBERT M. FILLMORE PRESIDING JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order Issued November 9, 2012

In The

No. 05-11-00451-CV

JULIAN AYMETT, Appellant

CITIBANK (SOUTH DAKOTA), N.A., Appellee

On Appeal from the 162nd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 10-04983-I

ORDER The Court has before it appellee Citibank (South Dakota), N.A.’s November 9, 2012

unopposed motion to reset oral argument scheduled for 9:00 a.m., November 13, 2012. The Court

GRANTS the motion to reset oral argument. The appeal will be rescheduled in due course for

submission, and the parties will be notified of the resetting.

ROBERT M. FILLMORE PRESIDING JUSTICE

Aymett, Julian v. Citibank South Dakota NA, (Tex. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Aymett, Julian v. Citibank South Dakota NA (Aymett, Julian v. Citibank South Dakota NA) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.