Aymar v. Chace

12 Barb. 301, 1851 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 85
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 1, 1851
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 12 Barb. 301 (Aymar v. Chace) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Aymar v. Chace, 12 Barb. 301, 1851 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 85 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1851).

Opinion

By the Court,

Edmonds, P. J.

In this case, a motion was made at chambers, for judgment for the defendant in the suit, because the plaintiff had not replied to the answer. The motion was denied, and from the order denying it, an appeal was taken.

That order was right. There is but one cape in which a judge [302]*302at chambers can grant a judgment, and that is under § 247 of the code, where if a demurrer, answer or reply be frivolous, the party prejudiced thereby may apply to a judge, either in or out of court, for judgment thereon, and judgment may be given accordingly. In all other cases, judgment can be rendered only by the court when sitting as such, and not by a judge at his lodgings, in the street, or even in chambers.

[New-York General Term, December 1, 1851.

The order must be affirmed with costs.

Edmonds, Mitchell and King, Justices.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Bookhout
21 Barb. 348 (New York Supreme Court, 1856)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
12 Barb. 301, 1851 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 85, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aymar-v-chace-nysupct-1851.