Aymar v. Chace

12 Barb. 301, 1851 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 85
New York Supreme Court·Decided December 1, 1851·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

By the Court,

Edmonds, P. J.

In this case, a motion was made at chambers, for judgment for the defendant in the suit, because the plaintiff had not replied to the answer. The motion was denied, and from the order denying it, an appeal was taken.

That order was right. There is but one cape in which a judge [302] at chambers can grant a judgment, and that is under § 247 of the code, where if a demurrer, answer or reply be frivolous, the party prejudiced thereby may apply to a judge, either in or out of court, for judgment thereon, and judgment may be given accordingly. In all other cases, judgment can be rendered only by the court when sitting as such, and not by a judge at his lodgings, in the street, or even in chambers.

[New-York General Term, December 1, 1851.

The order must be affirmed with costs.

Edmonds, Mitchell and King, Justices.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Aymar v. Chace, 12 Barb. 301, 1851 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 85 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1851).

12 Barb. 301 (Aymar v. Chace) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Bookhout
21 Barb. 348 (New York Supreme Court, 1856)