Aylesworth v. Milford
38 Ind. 226
Opinion
This suit was brought by Milford, Ex’r, against Aylesworth and McElroy, on a promissory note, and judgment was rendered against both of the defendants, and Aylesworth only appeals, and has not joined his co-defend.ant with him in the appeal, nor has he given McElroy notice, as required by sec. 551, 2 G. & H. 270.
The numerous and uniform rulings of this court are, that in such a case, the appeal must be dismissed.
The appeal is dismissed, at the costs of the appellant.
Motion to reinstate overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Aylesworth v. Milford, 38 Ind. 226 (Ind. 1871).
38 Ind. 226 (Aylesworth v. Milford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Brown v. Trexler
30 N.E. 418 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1892)
Rabb v. Graham
43 Ind. 1 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1873)