Ayers v. Marsh & McLennan Companies

Fourth Circuit

Ayers v. Marsh & McLennan Companies

155 F. App'x 685

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedNovember 29, 2005

DocketNo. 05-1117

StatusPublished

This text of 155 F. App'x 685 (Ayers v. Marsh & McLennan Companies) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ayers v. Marsh & McLennan Companies, 155 F. App'x 685 (4th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Robert L. Ayers appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc., in Ayers’ breach of contract action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Ayers v. Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc., No. CA-03-2239-2 (S.D.W.Va. Dec. 30, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Robert L. Ayers appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc., in Ayers’ breach of contract action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Ayers v. Marsh & McLennan Cos., Inc., No. CA-03-2239-2 (S.D.W.Va. Dec. 30, 2004). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

155 F. App'x 685, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ayers-v-marsh-mclennan-companies-ca4-2005.