Ayers v. Kingsbury ex rel. State Land Office

Supreme Court

Ayers v. Kingsbury ex rel. State Land Office

248 U.S. 544, 39 S. Ct. 135

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided January 7, 1919·No. No. 98·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) Messenger v. Kingsbury, 158 California, 611; People v. California Fish Co., 166 California, 576; People v. Banning Co., 166 California, 635. (2) Equitable Life Assurance [545]*545Society v. Brown, 187 U. S. 308, 314; Consolidated Turnpike Co. v. Norfolk &c. Ry. Co., 228 U. S. 596, 600; Manhattan Life Ins. Co. v. Cohen, 234 U. S. 123, 137. (3) Campbell v. Wade, 132 U. S. 34; Gonzales v. French, 164 U. S. 338, 345; Banning Co. v. California, 240 U. S. 142, 154.

Mr. Charles C. Boynton and Mr. Robert T. Devlin for plaintiffs in error. Mr. U. S. Webb for defendant in error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) Messenger v. Kingsbury, 158 California, 611; People v. California Fish Co., 166 California, 576; People v. Banning Co., 166 California, 635. (2) Equitable Life Assurance [545]*545Society v. Brown, 187 U. S. 308, 314; Consolidated Turnpike Co. v. Norfolk &c. Ry. Co., 228 U. S. 596, 600; Manhattan Life Ins. Co. v. Cohen, 234 U. S. 123, 137. (3) Campbell v. Wade, 132 U. S. 34; Gonzales v. French, 164 U. S. 338, 345; Banning Co. v. California, 240 U. S. 142, 154.

Mr. Charles C. Boynton and Mr. Robert T. Devlin for plaintiffs in error. Mr. U. S. Webb for defendant in error.

Ayers v. Kingsbury ex rel. State Land Office, 248 U.S. 544, 39 S. Ct. 135 (1919).

Pincite

248 U.S. 544 (Ayers v. Kingsbury ex rel. State Land Office) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related