Ayers v. Kingsbury ex rel. State Land Office
This text of 248 U.S. 544 (Ayers v. Kingsbury ex rel. State Land Office) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) Messenger v. Kingsbury, 158 California, 611; People v. California Fish Co., 166 California, 576; People v. Banning Co., 166 California, 635. (2) Equitable Life Assurance [545]*545Society v. Brown, 187 U. S. 308, 314; Consolidated Turnpike Co. v. Norfolk &c. Ry. Co., 228 U. S. 596, 600; Manhattan Life Ins. Co. v. Cohen, 234 U. S. 123, 137. (3) Campbell v. Wade, 132 U. S. 34; Gonzales v. French, 164 U. S. 338, 345; Banning Co. v. California, 240 U. S. 142, 154.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
248 U.S. 544, 39 S. Ct. 135, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ayers-v-kingsbury-ex-rel-state-land-office-scotus-1919.