Ayers v. Kingsbury ex rel. State Land Office

248 U.S. 544, 39 S. Ct. 135
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedJanuary 7, 1919
DocketNo. 98
StatusPublished

This text of 248 U.S. 544 (Ayers v. Kingsbury ex rel. State Land Office) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ayers v. Kingsbury ex rel. State Land Office, 248 U.S. 544, 39 S. Ct. 135 (1919).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1) Messenger v. Kingsbury, 158 California, 611; People v. California Fish Co., 166 California, 576; People v. Banning Co., 166 California, 635. (2) Equitable Life Assurance [545]*545Society v. Brown, 187 U. S. 308, 314; Consolidated Turnpike Co. v. Norfolk &c. Ry. Co., 228 U. S. 596, 600; Manhattan Life Ins. Co. v. Cohen, 234 U. S. 123, 137. (3) Campbell v. Wade, 132 U. S. 34; Gonzales v. French, 164 U. S. 338, 345; Banning Co. v. California, 240 U. S. 142, 154.

Mr. Charles C. Boynton and Mr. Robert T. Devlin for plaintiffs in error. Mr. U. S. Webb for defendant in error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Campbell v. Wade
132 U.S. 34 (Supreme Court, 1889)
Gonzales v. French
164 U.S. 338 (Supreme Court, 1896)
Equitable Life Assurance Society v. Brown
187 U.S. 308 (Supreme Court, 1902)
Manhattan Life Ins. Co. of NY v. Cohen
234 U.S. 123 (Supreme Court, 1914)
Banning Co. v. California Ex Rel. Webb
240 U.S. 142 (Supreme Court, 1916)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
248 U.S. 544, 39 S. Ct. 135, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ayers-v-kingsbury-ex-rel-state-land-office-scotus-1919.