Ayers v. Hope

64 So. 443, 67 Fla. 59
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided February 3, 1914·Published·Cited by 13 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.'

It appearing to the court that the appeal herein was entered in the court Minute Book and not in the Chancery Order Book, and further that it is from a decree in partition proceedings in which uumerous parties are interested who are not named in the appeal, and that this court is therefore without jurisdiction of the parties against whom the appeal is sought to be taken, it is ordered that the appeal be dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ayers v. Hope, 64 So. 443, 67 Fla. 59 (Fla. 1914).

64 So. 443 (Ayers v. Hope) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Chicken'N'Things v. Murray
329 So. 2d 302 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1976)
State v. Georgia Southern & Florida Railway Co.
190 So. 527 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1939)
State Ex Rel. Taylor v. Union Pacific Railroad
89 P.2d 1005 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1939)
Central Truck Lines, Inc. v. Railroad Commission
147 So. 590 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1933)
Florida Motor Lines, Inc. v. Railroad Commission
132 So. 851 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1931)
State Ex Rel. R. R. Comm'rs v. S. A. L. Ry. Co.
104 So. 602 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1925)
State ex rel. Burr v. Seaboard Air Line Railway Co.
89 Fla. 419 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1925)
Stone v. State ex rel. Lipscomb
68 Fla. 249 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1914)