Ayers v. Cleveland
This text of 103 N.E.3d 834 (Ayers v. Cleveland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Upon review of appellant's memorandum in support of jurisdiction, the court has determined that the memorandum fails to comply with the mechanical requirements of S.Ct.Prac.R. 3.09. Therefore, it is ordered by the court that appellant shall file an amended memorandum in support of jurisdiction no later than 5:00 p.m. on Friday, August 10, 2018, that fully complies with all the mechanical requirements imposed by S.Ct.Prac.R. 3.09. Specifically, the text of the document, excluding footnotes and quotations, shall be double-spaced, and the typeface must comply with S.Ct.Prac.R. 3.09(B)(1).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
103 N.E.3d 834, 2018 Ohio 3117, 153 Ohio St. 3d 1456, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ayers-v-cleveland-ohio-2018.