Ayer & Co. v. Kirkland

65 Ga. 303
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedFebruary 15, 1880
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 65 Ga. 303 (Ayer & Co. v. Kirkland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ayer & Co. v. Kirkland, 65 Ga. 303 (Ga. 1880).

Opinion

Notice given by plaintiffs in certiorari to the opposite party “that they had applied for and had issued a certiorari returnable to the next term of the court,” etc., was not a sufficient compliance with section 4059 of the Code, which requires notice to be given of the sanction of the writ of certiorari. In default of the notice required, the certiorari was properly dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Suggs v. Mutual Investment Co.
155 S.E. 534 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1930)
International Text Book Co. v. Fiel
54 S.E. 360 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1906)
Bunn v. Henderson
39 S.E. 78 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1901)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
65 Ga. 303, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ayer-co-v-kirkland-ga-1880.