Ayer & Co. v. Kirkland
65 Ga. 303
Opinion
Notice given by plaintiffs in certiorari to the opposite party “that they had applied for and had issued a certiorari returnable to the next term of the court,” etc., was not a sufficient compliance with section 4059 of the Code, which requires notice to be given of the sanction of the writ of certiorari. In default of the notice required, the certiorari was properly dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ayer & Co. v. Kirkland, 65 Ga. 303 (Ga. 1880).
65 Ga. 303 (Ayer & Co. v. Kirkland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Suggs v. Mutual Investment Co.
155 S.E. 534 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1930)
International Text Book Co. v. Fiel
54 S.E. 360 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1906)
Bunn v. Henderson
39 S.E. 78 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1901)