Aydelotte & Davis v. Warren

1 Del. Cas. 255
CourtDelaware Court of Common Pleas
DecidedApril 15, 1800
StatusPublished

This text of 1 Del. Cas. 255 (Aydelotte & Davis v. Warren) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Delaware Court of Common Pleas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Aydelotte & Davis v. Warren, 1 Del. Cas. 255 (Del. Super. Ct. 1800).

Opinion

Per Curiam. Booth, C. J.

(Charge.) Gentlemen of the jury, the present action which you are to try is an action of debt brought upon a note, which has been read, and the defendant has pleaded non est factum, that is, that it is not his deed. It is acknowledged there must be a delivery or it is not his deed. But [256]*256it was a sufficient delivery where the deed was thrown upon the table with the intent obligee might take it up. It has been held (4 Term 315) sufficient delivery if the party treats the deed as his own. A delivery may be presumed from circumstances.

Verdict for principal as debt, and damages to amount of interest.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Del. Cas. 255, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aydelotte-davis-v-warren-delctcompl-1800.