Aycock v. Richardson

100 S.E.2d 379, 247 N.C. 233, 1957 N.C. LEXIS 659
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedNovember 20, 1957
Docket531
StatusPublished
Cited by13 cases

This text of 100 S.E.2d 379 (Aycock v. Richardson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Aycock v. Richardson, 100 S.E.2d 379, 247 N.C. 233, 1957 N.C. LEXIS 659 (N.C. 1957).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

It is provided by statute, G.S. 1-279, that the appeal from a judgment rendered in term must be taken within ten days after its rendition, unless the record shows an appeal taken at the trial, which is sufficient. And it is provided by statute, G.S. 1-280, that within the time prescribed in G.S. 1-279 the appellant shall cause his appeal to be entered by the Clerk on the judgment docket and notice thereof to be given to the adverse party unless the record shows an appeal taken or prayed at the trial, which is sufficient.

_ Interpreting these two statutes the Court holds the provisions are jurisdictional, and unless complied with this Court acquires no jurisdiction of the appeal, and must dismiss it. See Mason v. Commrs. of Moore, 229 N.C. 626, 51 S.E. 2d, 6, and cases cited.

Moreover, the Clerk of this Court, at its direction, has obtained from Clerk of Superior Court of Cabarrus County certificate in which he certifies that: “I have examined the minutes in. the above entitled action; that said minutes contain no entries of appeal either by the plaintiff or by the defendant.”

Nevertheless, in case in hand, the Court has reviewed the record and purported case on appeal, and finds no prejudicial error. The case appears to have been fairly and fully presented to the *235 jury, and the jury has found that neither plaintiff nor defendants were guilty of negligence proximately causing the alleged injuries and damage.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Booth v. Utica Mutual Insurance
301 S.E.2d 98 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1983)
Housing Authority of the Raleigh v. Truesdale
253 S.E.2d 47 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1979)
Giannitrapani v. Duke University
228 S.E.2d 46 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1976)
Brooks v. Matthews
225 S.E.2d 159 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1976)
State Ex Rel. Moore v. Doe
198 S.E.2d 236 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1973)
Dunn v. North Carolina State Highway Commission
160 S.E.2d 113 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1968)
Oliver v. Williams
146 S.E.2d 648 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1966)
Teague v. Teague
146 S.E.2d 87 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1966)
JIM WALTER CORPORATION v. Gilliam
132 S.E.2d 313 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1963)
McBride Ex Rel. McBride v. North Carolina State Board of Education
125 S.E.2d 393 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1962)
Wolfe v. North Carolina
364 U.S. 177 (Supreme Court, 1960)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
100 S.E.2d 379, 247 N.C. 233, 1957 N.C. LEXIS 659, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aycock-v-richardson-nc-1957.