Ayangbesan v. Finkelstein

2019 NY Slip Op 1324
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 21, 2019
Docket8476 162328/15
StatusPublished

This text of 2019 NY Slip Op 1324 (Ayangbesan v. Finkelstein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ayangbesan v. Finkelstein, 2019 NY Slip Op 1324 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

Ayangbesan v Finkelstein (2019 NY Slip Op 01324)
Ayangbesan v Finkelstein
2019 NY Slip Op 01324
Decided on February 21, 2019
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on February 21, 2019
Friedman, J.P., Gische, Kapnick, Gesmer, Kern, JJ.

8476 162328/15

[*1]Aderonke Ayangbesan, Plaintiff-Respondent,

v

Seth Finkelstein, MD, Defendant-Appellant.


Aaronson Rappaport Feinstein & Deutsch, LLP, New York (Elliot J. Zucker of counsel), for appellant.

Thomas Torto, New York (Jason Levine of counsel), for respondent.



Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Alice Schlesinger, J.), entered November 9, 2016, which, inter alia, denied defendant's motion to dismiss the complaint as untimely, and granted plaintiff's cross motion to dismiss the second affirmative defense based upon the statute of limitations, unanimously modified, on the law, to deny the cross motion, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

On the record created by the parties' submissions on the motion and cross motion, triable issues exist as to whether defendant is equitably estopped to assert the affirmative defense of the statute of limitations (Simcuski v Saeli , 44 NY2d 442, 453-454 [1978]). Accordingly, while we affirm the denial of defendant's motion to dismiss the complaint as untimely, we modify to deny plaintiff's cross motion to dismiss the affirmative defense of the statute of limitations.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER

OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: FEBRUARY 21, 2019

CLERK



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 431
New York JUD § 431

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2019 NY Slip Op 1324, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ayangbesan-v-finkelstein-nyappdiv-2019.