Ayala v. Stafford
This text of Ayala v. Stafford (Ayala v. Stafford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Montana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
04/12/2021
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA Case Number: DA 20-0418
DA 20-0418 _________________
WADE AYALA,
Plaintiff, Counterclaim-Defendant and Appellee,
v.
GAIL STAFFORD,
Defendant, Counter-Claimant, Third-Party Plaintiff and Appellant,
RECONTRUST COMPANY, N.A.; BANK OF ORDER AMERICA, N.A.; EQUITY PROCESS MANAGEMENT, INC.; FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION; and DOES 1-10,
Third-Party Defendants, Appellees and Cross-Appellants,
EQUITY PROCESS MANAGEMENT, INC.; PAMELA PFAFF, Personal Representative of the Estate of JOSEPH NOWAKOWSKI; BRANDY LOU AYALA, SADIE LYNN BARRETT; and DOES 1-10,
Third-Party Defendants and Appellees. _________________
Appellee and Cross-Appellant Equity Process Management Inc. (Equity), by counsel, has filed a motion for extension of time to file its cross-appeal reply brief. IT IS ORDERED that Equity’s motion for extension of time is GRANTED. Equity has until May 14, 2021, within which to file its reply brief. No further extensions will be granted.
Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court April 12 2021
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ayala v. Stafford, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ayala-v-stafford-mont-2021.