Ayala v. Delgado

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Ayala v. Delgado

278 A.D.2d 59, 718 N.Y.S.2d 295, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13093

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 12, 2000

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 278 A.D.2d 59 (Ayala v. Delgado) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ayala v. Delgado, 278 A.D.2d 59, 718 N.Y.S.2d 295, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13093 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Anne Targum, J.), entered on or about July 7, 2000, which granted defendants’ motions to vacate the note of issue, and denied plaintiffs cross motion to “implement” a prior decision of Justice Kenneth Thompson, Jr. directing that an order be settled granting a default judgment as against two of the three defendants, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Justice Targum properly rejected plaintiffs request that she implement Justice Thompson’s decision, with appropriate advice to present such request to Justice Thompson. In light of the strong public policy favoring resolution of disputes on the merits and plaintiffs failure to provide any disclosure, the note of issue was properly vacated. Concur — Tom, J. P., Ellerin, Wallach, Rubin and Saxe, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Anne Targum, J.), entered on or about July 7, 2000, which granted defendants’ motions to vacate the note of issue, and denied plaintiffs cross motion to “implement” a prior decision of Justice Kenneth Thompson, Jr. directing that an order be settled granting a default judgment as against two of the three defendants, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Justice Targum properly rejected plaintiffs request that she implement Justice Thompson’s decision, with appropriate advice to present such request to Justice Thompson. In light of the strong public policy favoring resolution of disputes on the merits and plaintiffs failure to provide any disclosure, the note of issue was properly vacated. Concur — Tom, J. P., Ellerin, Wallach, Rubin and Saxe, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

278 A.D.2d 59, 718 N.Y.S.2d 295, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13093, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ayala-v-delgado-nyappdiv-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack