Axelrod v. State
This text of 789 S.W.2d 594 (Axelrod v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
Appellant was convicted by a jury of contributing to the delinquency of a minor. The trial court assessed punishment, enhanced by one prior conviction, at thirty (30) days in the Harris County Jail. Appellant’s conviction was affirmed on appeal. Axelrod v. State, 764 S.W.2d 296 (Tex.App.—Houston [1st] 1988).
We granted appellant’s petition for discretionary review to examine the following ground for review: “The Court of Appeals erred in holding that the evidence was sufficient because there was no evidence of a voluntary act of omission by appellant as required by section 6.01 of the Penal Code.”
After careful review of the briefs and the Court of Appeals’ opinion, we have determined that appellant’s petition for discretionary review was improvidently granted.
Appellant’s petition for discretionary review is therefore ordered dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
789 S.W.2d 594, 1990 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 93, 1990 WL 70661, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/axelrod-v-state-texcrimapp-1990.