Axelrod v. Levine

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Axelrod v. Levine

177 A.D. 932

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 15, 1917

StatusPublished

This text of 177 A.D. 932 (Axelrod v. Levine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Axelrod v. Levine, 177 A.D. 932 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

We think that it does not sufficiently appear that Sarafan was a party to the act of Levine in drawing down the loan value of his life insurance policy, but in other respects that the determination is justified by the facts. This failure to connect Sarafan with that act is not sufficient to exonerate him from the consequences of the decision. The order is modified so as to dissociate Sarafan from the matter of the life insurance policy; and as so modified affirmed, with ten dollar's costs and disbursements. Jenks, P. J., Mills, Rich, Putnam and Blackmar, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

We think that it does not sufficiently appear that Sarafan was a party to the act of Levine in drawing down the loan value of his life insurance policy, but in other respects that the determination is justified by the facts. This failure to connect Sarafan with that act is not sufficient to exonerate him from the consequences of the decision. The order is modified so as to dissociate Sarafan from the matter of the life insurance policy; and as so modified affirmed, with ten dollar's costs and disbursements. Jenks, P. J., Mills, Rich, Putnam and Blackmar, JJ., concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

177 A.D. 932, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/axelrod-v-levine-nyappdiv-1917.