Axelrod v. Gliedman

476 N.E.2d 1001, 64 N.Y.2d 876, 487 N.Y.S.2d 556, 1985 N.Y. LEXIS 14185
New York Court of Appeals·Decided February 21, 1985·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), appeal by respondent Milton Fishkin dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that the order of the Appellate Division, insofar as it pertains to him does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution; order insofar as appealed from by plaintiff Axelrod et al. affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (104 AD2d 327).

[878]*878Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Jasen, Meyer, Simons and Kaye. Taking no part: Judge Alexander.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Axelrod v. Gliedman, 476 N.E.2d 1001, 64 N.Y.2d 876, 487 N.Y.S.2d 556, 1985 N.Y. LEXIS 14185 (N.Y. 1985).

476 N.E.2d 1001 (Axelrod v. Gliedman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lewisburg Community Hospital, Inc. v. Alfredson
805 S.W.2d 756 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1991)
Rockland Physician Associates, P.C. v. Grodin
616 F. Supp. 958 (S.D. New York, 1985)