Axelrod v. Gliedman
This text of 476 N.E.2d 1001 (Axelrod v. Gliedman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), appeal by respondent Milton Fishkin dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that the order of the Appellate Division, insofar as it pertains to him does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution; order insofar as appealed from by plaintiff Axelrod et al. affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (104 AD2d 327).
[878]*878Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Jasen, Meyer, Simons and Kaye. Taking no part: Judge Alexander.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
476 N.E.2d 1001, 64 N.Y.2d 876, 487 N.Y.S.2d 556, 1985 N.Y. LEXIS 14185, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/axelrod-v-gliedman-ny-1985.