Awoshiley v. Beth Israel Medical Center

81 A.D.3d 517, 916 N.Y.S.2d 505

This text of 81 A.D.3d 517 (Awoshiley v. Beth Israel Medical Center) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Awoshiley v. Beth Israel Medical Center, 81 A.D.3d 517, 916 N.Y.S.2d 505 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

— Order, Supreme Court, New York County (O. Feter Sherwood, J.), entered August 5, 2009, which granted defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a cause of action, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

[518]*518Plaintiffs retaliatory discharge claim fails to state a cause of action because it does not allege any conduct by defendants that violates the Executive Law (see Executive Law § 296 [1] [e]; Forrest v Jewish Guild for the Blind, 3 NY3d 295, 312-313 [2004]). His defamation claim is pleaded with insufficient particularity (see Mañas v VMS Assoc., LLC, 53 AD3d 451, 454-455 [2008]). The remaining cause of action, civil conspiracy, is not an independent cause of action in New York (American Preferred Prescription v Health Mgt., 252 AD2d 414, 416 [1998]). Concur — Tom, J.P., Saxe, DeGrasse, Freedman and Román, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Forrest v. Jewish Guild for the Blind
819 N.E.2d 998 (New York Court of Appeals, 2004)
Mañas v. VMS Associates, LLC
53 A.D.3d 451 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
American Preferred Prescription, Inc. v. Health Management, Inc.
252 A.D.2d 414 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
81 A.D.3d 517, 916 N.Y.S.2d 505, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/awoshiley-v-beth-israel-medical-center-nyappdiv-2011.