Awe v. Clarke

Fourth Circuit

Awe v. Clarke

589 F. App'x 204

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 20, 2015·No. No. 14-7137·Published

Opinion

[205] Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Kenneth Valentine Awe appeals the district court’s orders dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint as frivolous, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(l) (2012), and denying his motion to alter or amend. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,' we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Awe v. Clarke, No. 7:14-cv-00248-JLK-RSB (W.D.Va. July 3 & 18, 2014). We deny Awe’s motion for counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[205] Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Kenneth Valentine Awe appeals the district court’s orders dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint as frivolous, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(l) (2012), and denying his motion to alter or amend. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,' we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Awe v. Clarke, No. 7:14-cv-00248-JLK-RSB (W.D.Va. July 3 & 18, 2014). We deny Awe’s motion for counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Awe v. Clarke, 589 F. App'x 204 (4th Cir. 2015).

Pincite

589 F. App'x 204 (Awe v. Clarke) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related