Awbrey v. Foster
74 S.E. 758, 138 Ga. 94, 1912 Ga. LEXIS 203
Opinion
“The first grant of a new trial will not be disturbed by the Supreme Court, unless the plaintiff in error shows that the judge abused his discretion in granting it, and that the law and facts inquire the verdict notwithstanding the judgment of the presiding judge.” Civil Code, § 6204.
(a) The law and the facts in this case did not require the verdict rendered, and the trial judge did not abuse his discretion in the first grant of a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Awbrey v. Foster, 74 S.E. 758, 138 Ga. 94, 1912 Ga. LEXIS 203 (Ga. 1912).
74 S.E. 758 (Awbrey v. Foster) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Chappell v. Clegg
104 S.E.2d 541 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1958)