AW v. State

15 So. 3d 929, 2009 WL 2407663
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in AW v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 3721
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 7, 2009·No. 5D08-2920·Published

Opinion

15 So.3d 929 (2009)

A.W., A Child, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 5D08-2920.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

August 7, 2009.

James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and David S. Morgan, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Rebecca Rock McGuigan, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

SAWAYA, J.

A.W., a juvenile adjudicated delinquent for possession of cocaine, contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion for dismissal at the conclusion of the evidence portion of the trial. As to that issue, we affirm without further discussion.

A.W. also contends that the trial court erred in imposing costs of prosecution pursuant to section 938.29, Florida Statutes (2009), in the amount of $150. We agree. It is clear that section 938.29 does not authorize the imposition of costs of prosecution in delinquency cases, and the State concedes that imposition of these costs is error.

Accordingly, the order of delinquency is affirmed. That part of the order assessing the costs of prosecution is reversed.

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part.

MONACO, C.J. and COHEN, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

AW v. State, 15 So. 3d 929, 2009 WL 2407663 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

15 So. 3d 929 (AW v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.