A.W. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

A.W. v. State

882 So. 2d 528, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 13849, 2004 WL 2101913

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedSeptember 22, 2004

DocketNo. 4D03-2654

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 882 So. 2d 528 (A.W. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

A.W. v. State, 882 So. 2d 528, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 13849, 2004 WL 2101913 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The State filed a Petition for Delinquency charging A.W., a juvenile, with two counts of aggravated battery. A.W. was found guilty of a lesser charge of battery on Count I and found guilty of aggravated battery on Count II. The trial court entered a Disposition Order adjudicating A.W. delinquent and committing him to a high-risk, level 8 residential program. A.W. appeals the Disposition Order and argues that the trial court erred in failing to enter separate disposition orders for the two offenses. The State concedes and agrees that the matter should be remanded with instructions to enter separate disposition orders for the two,offenses. See L.W.G. v. State, 785 So.2d 696 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001) (holding that when a trial court adjudicates a juvenile delinquent for more than one offense, separate disposition orders must be entered for each adjudicated offense).

..REMANDED.

STONE, TAYLOR and HAZOURI, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The State filed a Petition for Delinquency charging A.W., a juvenile, with two counts of aggravated battery. A.W. was found guilty of a lesser charge of battery on Count I and found guilty of aggravated battery on Count II. The trial court entered a Disposition Order adjudicating A.W. delinquent and committing him to a high-risk, level 8 residential program. A.W. appeals the Disposition Order and argues that the trial court erred in failing to enter separate disposition orders for the two offenses. The State concedes and agrees that the matter should be remanded with instructions to enter separate disposition orders for the two,offenses. See L.W.G. v. State, 785 So.2d 696 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001) (holding that when a trial court adjudicates a juvenile delinquent for more than one offense, separate disposition orders must be entered for each adjudicated offense).

..REMANDED.

STONE, TAYLOR and HAZOURI, JJ„ concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

882 So. 2d 528, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 13849, 2004 WL 2101913, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aw-v-state-fladistctapp-2004.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack