Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Avtsin v. Kemelman

Avtsin v. Kemelman

228 A.D.2d 399, 643 N.Y.2d 412, 643 N.Y.S.2d 412, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6194
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 3, 1996
StatusPublished

This text of 228 A.D.2d 399 (Avtsin v. Kemelman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Avtsin v. Kemelman, 228 A.D.2d 399, 643 N.Y.2d 412, 643 N.Y.S.2d 412, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6194 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

Under the circumstances, the undertaking directed by the Supreme Court is adequate to reimburse the defendants for any damages they may sustain if it is later finally determined that the preliminary injunction was erroneously granted (see, CPLR 6312 [b]; Margolies v Encounter, Inc., 42 NY2d 475, 477). Bracken, J. P., O’Brien, Joy and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Margolies v. Encounter, Inc.
368 N.E.2d 1243 (New York Court of Appeals, 1977)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
228 A.D.2d 399, 643 N.Y.2d 412, 643 N.Y.S.2d 412, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6194, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/avtsin-v-kemelman-nyappdiv-1996.