Avriett v. Osborne

116 So. 477, 95 Fla. 521
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedMarch 17, 1928
StatusPublished

This text of 116 So. 477 (Avriett v. Osborne) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Avriett v. Osborne, 116 So. 477, 95 Fla. 521 (Fla. 1928).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record upon writ of error taken under the statute to the order of the Circuit Court granting a new trial herein and the briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Couft that there is no error in the said order. It is, therefore, considered, ordered, and adjudged by the Court that the said order be and is hereby affirmed. See Lockhart v. Butt-Landstreet, 91 Fla. 497, 107 So. 641; *522 Suttles v. Burbridge, 91 Fla. 273, 107 So. 646; Phillips v. Lowenstein, 91 Fla. 89, 107 So. 350.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Suttles v. Burbridge
107 So. 646 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1926)
Phillips v. Lowenstein
107 So. 350 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1926)
Lockhart, Admr. v. Butt-Landstreet
107 So. 641 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1926)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
116 So. 477, 95 Fla. 521, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/avriett-v-osborne-fla-1928.