Avriett v. Osborne

116 So. 477, 95 Fla. 521
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided March 17, 1928·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This cause having heretofore been submitted to the Court upon the transcript of the record upon writ of error taken under the statute to the order of the Circuit Court granting a new trial herein and the briefs and argument of counsel for the respective parties, and the record having been seen and inspected, and the Court being now advised of its judgment to be given in the premises, it seems to the Couft that there is no error in the said order. It is, therefore, considered, ordered, and adjudged by the Court that the said order be and is hereby affirmed. See Lockhart v. Butt-Landstreet, 91 Fla. 497, 107 So. 641; *522 Suttles v. Burbridge, 91 Fla. 273, 107 So. 646; Phillips v. Lowenstein, 91 Fla. 89, 107 So. 350.

Affirmed.

Whitfield, P. J., and Terrell and Buford, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Avriett v. Osborne, 116 So. 477, 95 Fla. 521 (Fla. 1928).

116 So. 477 (Avriett v. Osborne) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Suttles v. Burbridge
107 So. 646 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1926)
Phillips v. Lowenstein
107 So. 350 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1926)
Lockhart, Admr. v. Butt-Landstreet
107 So. 641 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1926)