Avram v. Hammond

107 N.E.2d 882, 348 Ill. App. 68

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Avram v. Hammond. Read the opinion of the Court — 348 Ill. App. 68 →

Appellate Court of Illinois·Decided October 7, 1952·No. Gen. No. 10,605·Published

Opinion

348 Ill. App. 68 (1952) 107 N.E.2d 882

Lola M. Avram, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Fletcher Hammond, Aurora City Lines, Inc., William R. Woods and Fred O. Leonard, Defendants-Appellants.

Gen. No. 10,605.

Illinois Appellate Court.

Opinion filed September 9, 1952. Released for publication October 7, 1952.

Puklin, Puklin, Nelson & Page, for certain *69 appellants, and Putnam, Johnson & Alschuler, for certain other appellants.

Reid & Ochsenchlager, for appellee.

Lambert M. Ochsenchlager, and William C. Murphy, of counsel.

(Abstract of Decision.)

Opinion by JUSTICE WOLFE.

Judgment affirmed upon remittitur of $2,500, otherwise reversed and a new trial granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

348 Ill. App. 68 (1952) 107 N.E.2d 882

Lola M. Avram, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Fletcher Hammond, Aurora City Lines, Inc., William R. Woods and Fred O. Leonard, Defendants-Appellants.

Gen. No. 10,605.

Illinois Appellate Court.

Opinion filed September 9, 1952. Released for publication October 7, 1952.

Puklin, Puklin, Nelson & Page, for certain *69 appellants, and Putnam, Johnson & Alschuler, for certain other appellants.

Reid & Ochsenchlager, for appellee.

Lambert M. Ochsenchlager, and William C. Murphy, of counsel.

(Abstract of Decision.)

Opinion by JUSTICE WOLFE.

Judgment affirmed upon remittitur of $2,500, otherwise reversed and a new trial granted.

Avram v. Hammond, 107 N.E.2d 882, 348 Ill. App. 68 (Ill. Ct. App. 1952).

Pincite

107 N.E.2d 882 (Avram v. Hammond) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Avram v. Hammond

107 N.E.2d 882 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1952)