AVONTA DINKENS v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE
This text of AVONTA DINKENS v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE (AVONTA DINKENS v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL
OF FLORIDA
SECOND DISTRICT
AVONTA DINKENS, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D17-2957 ) DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE and TINA ) RENA TILLMAN, ) ) Appellees. ) )
Opinion filed April 25, 2018.
Appeal from the Department of Revenue.
Avonta Dickens, pro se.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Toni C. Bernstein, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee Department of Revenue.
No appearance for remaining Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the Department of Revenue's child support order without
comment and without prejudice to any right Mr. Dinkens may have to seek modification
of the support obligations in this administrative order, which were based on temporary
custody and time-sharing arrangements that may differ from final time-sharing arrangements established by the final judgment of dissolution of marriage rendered
after the order on appeal.
Affirmed.
KHOUZAM, LUCAS, and SALARIO, JJ., Concur.
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
AVONTA DINKENS v. DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/avonta-dinkens-v-department-of-revenue-fladistctapp-2018.