Avonda Grant and Raymond Grant v. Deatra Haynes
Opinion
In The
Court of Appeals
Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
__________________
NO. 09-20-00257-CV __________________
AVONDA GRANT AND RAYMOND GRANT, Appellants
V.
DEATRA HAYNES, Appellee
__________________________________________________________________
On Appeal from the 1st District Court Jasper County, Texas Trial Cause No. 38437 __________________________________________________________________
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellants Avonda Grant and Raymond Grant filed a notice of appeal from
a judgment signed on October 7, 2020. On January 12, 2021, we notified the parties
that the clerk’s record had not been filed due to appellants’ failure to pay, or to
arrange to pay, the District Clerk’s fee for preparing the clerk’s record. The notice
also warned Appellants that their appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution
unless they either paid the filing fee or established that they paid the fee or needed
additional time to do so. By separate letter on January 12, 2021, we notified the
1 parties that the appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution unless Appellants
remitted the filing fee for the appeal. None of the parties filed a response.
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P.
37.3(b); see also Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b), (c).
APPEAL DISMISSED.
PER CURIAM
Submitted on March 10, 2021 Opinion Delivered March 11, 2021
Before Kreger, Horton, and Johnson, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Avonda Grant and Raymond Grant v. Deatra Haynes (Avonda Grant and Raymond Grant v. Deatra Haynes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.