Avon Products, Inc. v. Solow
425 N.E.2d 894, 54 N.Y.2d 637, 442 N.Y.S.2d 506, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 2601
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
On summary consideration, order affirmed, with costs, and question certified answered in the affirmative. The arbitration clause at issue is broad enough to embrace all disputes concerning the correctness of the rental increase notice given by defendant to plaintiff.
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler and Meyer. Taking no part: Judge Fuchsberg.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Avon Products, Inc. v. Solow, 425 N.E.2d 894, 54 N.Y.2d 637, 442 N.Y.S.2d 506, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 2601 (N.Y. 1981).
425 N.E.2d 894 (Avon Products, Inc. v. Solow) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Olympia & York OLP Co. v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.
214 A.D.2d 509 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
Avon Products, Inc. v. Solow
150 A.D.2d 236 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
Morgan Guaranty Trust Co. v. Solow
498 N.E.2d 147 (New York Court of Appeals, 1986)
Morgan Guaranty Trust Co. v. Solow
114 A.D.2d 818 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)