Avon Electrical Supplies, Inc. v. Goldsmith

54 A.D.2d 552, 387 N.Y.S.2d 1, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13857
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 20, 1976·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

In an action to foreclose a mechanic’s lien, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, entered January 13, 1976, which (1) denied its application, pursuant to section 12-a of the Lien Law, to amend its notice of lien nunc pro tunc and (2) granted respondent Slayton’s cross motion to vacate and discharge its notice of lien. Order affirmed, with $50 costs and disbursements. Amendment of the notice of lien under section 12-a of the Lien Law was not a remedy available to plaintiff on the facts of this case because there had not been substantial compliance with the provision of the Lien Law requiring a description of the subject property (see Lien Law, § 9, subd 7; § 23). The lienor described, and filed a lien against, property adjacent to the improved premises. Gulotta, P. J., Hopkins, Latham, Cohalan and Hawkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Avon Electrical Supplies, Inc. v. Goldsmith, 54 A.D.2d 552, 387 N.Y.S.2d 1, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13857 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

54 A.D.2d 552 (Avon Electrical Supplies, Inc. v. Goldsmith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Santucci Construction Corp. v. Errico
242 A.D.2d 696 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
In re Atlas Tile & Marble Works, Inc.
191 A.D.2d 247 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
Fremar Building Corp. v. Sand
104 A.D.2d 1025 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)