Avon Electrical Supplies, Inc. v. Christ Gatzonis Electric Contractors, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Avon Electrical Supplies, Inc. v. Christ Gatzonis Electric Contractors, Inc.

235 A.D.2d 380, 652 N.Y.S.2d 72, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 147

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 13, 1997

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 235 A.D.2d 380 (Avon Electrical Supplies, Inc. v. Christ Gatzonis Electric Contractors, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Avon Electrical Supplies, Inc. v. Christ Gatzonis Electric Contractors, Inc., 235 A.D.2d 380, 652 N.Y.S.2d 72, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 147 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action, inter alia, to recover for goods sold and delivered, the defendant Colonia Insurance Company appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Kitzes, J.), dated June 28, 1995, as denied the branch of its motion which was for summary judgment on its cross claim against the defendant New York City School Construction Authority.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly denied the branch of the motion of the defendant Colonia Insurance Company (hereinafter Colonia) for summary judgment against the defendant New York City School Construction Authority (hereinafter the SCA) for the moneys the SCA withheld from Colonia’s principal, the defendant Christ Gatzonis Electric Contractors, Inc. (hereinafter Gatzonis), for work Gatzonis performed under certain school construction contracts prior to their termination by the SCA. The payments which were withheld by the SCA do not constitute assets of a Lien Law article 3-A trust (see, Tri-City Elec. Co. v People, 96 AD2d 146, 152, affd 63 NY2d 969; Palmer Constr. v Hines, 154 Misc 2d 248, 251; Fehlhaber Corp. v Levitt, 64 Misc 2d 495, 497; see also, Interel Envtl. Tech, v United Jersey Bank, 894 F Supp 623, 634; 3 Warren’s Weed, New York Real Property, Mechanics’ Liens, § 15.03 [5] [4th ed]).

Nor may Colonia recover from the SCA pursuant to the contracts, since there are criminal charges pending against Gatzonis which relate to the disputed contracts. If the criminal charges against Gatzonis are sustained, the SCA may rescind [381]*381the contracts and not be liable to Gatzonis for work performed thereunder (see, Jered Constr. Corp. v New York City Tr. Auth., 22 NY2d 187, 193). Mangano, P. J., Bracken, Copertino and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action, inter alia, to recover for goods sold and delivered, the defendant Colonia Insurance Company appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Kitzes, J.), dated June 28, 1995, as denied the branch of its motion which was for summary judgment on its cross claim against the defendant New York City School Construction Authority.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly denied the branch of the motion of the defendant Colonia Insurance Company (hereinafter Colonia) for summary judgment against the defendant New York City School Construction Authority (hereinafter the SCA) for the moneys the SCA withheld from Colonia’s principal, the defendant Christ Gatzonis Electric Contractors, Inc. (hereinafter Gatzonis), for work Gatzonis performed under certain school construction contracts prior to their termination by the SCA. The payments which were withheld by the SCA do not constitute assets of a Lien Law article 3-A trust (see, Tri-City Elec. Co. v People, 96 AD2d 146, 152, affd 63 NY2d 969; Palmer Constr. v Hines, 154 Misc 2d 248, 251; Fehlhaber Corp. v Levitt, 64 Misc 2d 495, 497; see also, Interel Envtl. Tech, v United Jersey Bank, 894 F Supp 623, 634; 3 Warren’s Weed, New York Real Property, Mechanics’ Liens, § 15.03 [5] [4th ed]).

Nor may Colonia recover from the SCA pursuant to the contracts, since there are criminal charges pending against Gatzonis which relate to the disputed contracts. If the criminal charges against Gatzonis are sustained, the SCA may rescind [381]*381the contracts and not be liable to Gatzonis for work performed thereunder (see, Jered Constr. Corp. v New York City Tr. Auth., 22 NY2d 187, 193). Mangano, P. J., Bracken, Copertino and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

235 A.D.2d 380, 652 N.Y.S.2d 72, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 147, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/avon-electrical-supplies-inc-v-christ-gatzonis-electric-contractors-nyappdiv-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack