Avon Bard LLC v. Michael Offit
This text of Avon Bard LLC v. Michael Offit (Avon Bard LLC v. Michael Offit) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports. -----------------------------------------------------------------
No. 137 SSM 16 Rosemarie A. Herman, &c., et al., Respondents, Avon Bard LLC, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Julian Maurice Herman, et al., Appellants, Michael Offit, et al., Defendants. (And a Third-Party Action.)
Submitted by John Siegal, for appellants. Submitted by Natasha Shishov, for respondents.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules, order affirmed, with costs, and certified question answered in the affirmative. Supreme Court did not abuse its discretion in precluding defendant Julian Maurice Herman from participating in the inquest to assess damages against him. Moreover, the denial of that defendant's cross motion was proper. Chief Judge DiFiore and Judges Rivera, Stein, Fahey, Garcia and Wilson concur. Judge Feinman took no part.
Decided October 12, 2017
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Avon Bard LLC v. Michael Offit, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/avon-bard-llc-v-michael-offit-ny-2017.