Avis Rent-a-Car Systems, Inc. v. Hercules

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Avis Rent-a-Car Systems, Inc. v. Hercules

515 So. 2d 418, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2640, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11109

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedNovember 17, 1987

DocketNo. 87-1848

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 515 So. 2d 418 (Avis Rent-a-Car Systems, Inc. v. Hercules) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Avis Rent-a-Car Systems, Inc. v. Hercules, 515 So. 2d 418, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2640, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11109 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the order denying the defendant’s motion to vacate the default judgment because we find that the defendant satisfied the two-prong test for vacating a default judgment which requires a showing of excusable neglect and a meritorious defense. See Gibraltar Serv. Carp, v. Lone & Assocs., Inc., 488 So.2d 582 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986). The trial court found that the defendant demonstrated excusable neglect in failing to timely file a response to the complaint. We find that the motion to vacate the default judgment, which tendered an answer containing a general denial of negligence, was sufficient to establish a meritorious defense. North Shore Hosp., Inc. v. Barber, 143 So.2d 849 (Fla. 1962); Pedro Realty, Inc. v. Silva, 399 So.2d 367 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); Bay Convalescent Center, Inc. v. Carroll, 352 So.2d 900, 904 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977) (Ervin, J. dissenting), cert. dismissed, 364 So.2d 881 (Fla.1978).

Accordingly, the order is reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the order denying the defendant’s motion to vacate the default judgment because we find that the defendant satisfied the two-prong test for vacating a default judgment which requires a showing of excusable neglect and a meritorious defense. See Gibraltar Serv. Carp, v. Lone & Assocs., Inc., 488 So.2d 582 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986). The trial court found that the defendant demonstrated excusable neglect in failing to timely file a response to the complaint. We find that the motion to vacate the default judgment, which tendered an answer containing a general denial of negligence, was sufficient to establish a meritorious defense. North Shore Hosp., Inc. v. Barber, 143 So.2d 849 (Fla. 1962); Pedro Realty, Inc. v. Silva, 399 So.2d 367 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); Bay Convalescent Center, Inc. v. Carroll, 352 So.2d 900, 904 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977) (Ervin, J. dissenting), cert. dismissed, 364 So.2d 881 (Fla.1978).

Accordingly, the order is reversed and remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

515 So. 2d 418, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 2640, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 11109, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/avis-rent-a-car-systems-inc-v-hercules-fladistctapp-1987.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack