Aviram v. The Bank of New York Mellon

CourtDistrict Court, M.D. Florida
DecidedJune 30, 2021
Docket8:21-cv-00432
StatusUnknown

This text of Aviram v. The Bank of New York Mellon (Aviram v. The Bank of New York Mellon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, M.D. Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Aviram v. The Bank of New York Mellon, (M.D. Fla. 2021).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

JIMMY AVIRAM,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 8:21-cv-432-TPB-CPT

THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, as Trustee for the Certificate holders of CWMBS, Inc., CHL Mortgage Pass- Through Trust 2006-TMI, Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2006-TM f/k/a THE BANK OF NEW YORK,

Defendant. ______________________________________/

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO REMAND AND MOTIONS TO STAY; and

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO VACATE DEFAULT AND QUASH SERVICE

This matter is before the Court on several motions: (1) “Plaintiff’s Motion for Remand and Incorporated Memorandum of Law” (Doc. 3);

(2) “Plaintiff’s Motion to Stay Adjudication of Any Service / Remand Issues Pending Deposition, Motion to Compel Defendant’s Deposition, and Incorporated Memorandum of Law” (Doc. 15);

(3) “Plaintiff’s Supplemental Motion to Stay Adjudication of Any Service / Remand Issues Pending Discovery from CT, Motion to Allow Subpoena Duces Tecum to CT, and Incorporated Memorandum of Law” (Doc. 18);

(4) “BONYM’s Memorandum Incorporating and Re-Filing State Court Motion to Vacate Default Final Judgment, to Set Aside Clerk’s Default, and to Quash Service” (Doc. 23). The parties filed responses to each of the motions. (Docs. 19; 20; 24; 29). After reviewing the motions, responses, court file, and record, the Court finds as follows: Plaintiff Jimmy Aviram moves to remand this action, arguing that Defendant The Bank of New York Mellon untimely removed this action. Defendant argues that it was not properly served, and it seeks to quash service of process and vacate the

default judgment against it. Several courts have recently addressed substantially similar or identical issues involving improper attempts to serve Defendant. See, e.g., Centurion Sys., LLC v. Bank of N.Y. Mellon, No. 8:21-cv-726-SDM-AAS, 2021 WL 1526272, at *1 (M.D. Fla. Apr. 19, 2021); Kaye v. The Bank of N.Y. Mellon as Tr. For Certificate holders of CWALT, Inc., Alternative Loan Tr. 2007-OH3, Mortg. Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2007-OH3, No. 8:21-cv-469-WFJ-TGW, 2021 WL 1390019, at *3 (M.D. Fla. Apr. 13,

2021); Eaton v. The Bank of N.Y. Mellon, No. 3:21cv251-MCR-EMT, 2021 WL 1345533, at *4 (N.D. Fla. Apr. 9, 2021); Bonafide Properties, LLC v. Bank of N.Y. Mellon, No. 5:21cv54-TKW-MJF, 2021 WL 1186332, at *2 (N.D. Fla. Mar. 29, 2021); Gossamer Wing, LLC v. Bank of N.Y. Mellon as Tr. for Certificate holders of CWABS, Inc., Asset- Backed Certificates, Series 2007-2, No. 21-80319-CIV-CANNON/Brannon, 2021 WL 857527, at *4 (S.D. Fla. Mar. 7, 2021). The Court sees no reason to depart from the

analysis in these well-reasoned decisions. As a result, Plaintiff’s motion to remand is denied, and Defendant’s motions to quash service of process and to vacate the default judgment are granted. The return of service on The Bank of New York Mellon is quashed, and the default judgment entered by the state court is vacated. The motions to stay are denied. Accordingly, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED: (1) “Plaintiff's Motion for Remand and Incorporated Memorandum of Law” (Doc. 3) is DENIED. (2) “Plaintiff's Motion to Stay Adjudication of Any Service / Remand Issues Pending Deposition, Motion to Compel Defendant’s Deposition, and Incorporated Memorandum of Law” (Doc. 15) is DENIED. (3) “Plaintiff's Supplemental Motion to Stay Adjudication of Any Service / Remand Issues Pending Discovery from CT, Motion to Allow Subpoena Duces Tecum to CT, and Incorporated Memorandum of Law” (Doc. 18) is DENIED. (4) “BONYM’s Memorandum Incorporating and Re-Filing State Court Motion to Vacate Default Final Judgment, to Set Aside Clerk’s Default, and to Quash Service” (Doc. 23) is GRANTED. (5) The return of service on The Bank of New York Mellon is QUASHED. (6) The Clerk is directed to VACATE the default judgment entered by the state court. DONE and ORDERED in Chambers, in Tampa, Florida, this 30th day of June, 2021.

peed Yh

-TOMBARBER i (sssi(‘“‘—s:sts~™S UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Page 3 of 3

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Aviram v. The Bank of New York Mellon, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aviram-v-the-bank-of-new-york-mellon-flmd-2021.