Aviles v. 938 SCY Ltd.

283 A.D.2d 935, 725 N.Y.S.2d 256, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4602
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 2, 2001
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 283 A.D.2d 935 (Aviles v. 938 SCY Ltd.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Aviles v. 938 SCY Ltd., 283 A.D.2d 935, 725 N.Y.S.2d 256, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4602 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Opinion

—Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memo[936]*936randum: Supreme Court erred in denying the motion of 938 SCY Limited, d/b/a Friends & Players (defendant), seeking to strike the note of issue and certificate of readiness. Defendant sought that relief within 20 days after service of the note of issue and certificate of readiness and provided an affidavit “showing in what respects the case [was] not ready for trial” (22 NYCRR 202.21 [e]; see, Audiovox Corp. v Benyamini, 265 AD2d 135, 139). Contrary to plaintiff’s contention, defendant was not required to demonstrate unusual or unanticipated circumstances in seeking this relief under 22 NYCRR 202.21 (e) (see, Audiovox Corp. v Benyamini, supra, at 139-140; cf., 22 NYCRR 202.21 [d]). Also contrary to plaintiff’s contention, discovery was incomplete when the note of issue and certificate of readiness was filed. Thus, we modify the order by granting defendant’s motion and striking the note of issue and certificate of readiness. Based on our resolution of this issue, we do not address defendant’s remaining contention. (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Barry, J. — Discovery.) Present — Pigott, Jr., P. J., Pine, Hayes, Kehoe and Burns, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Tirado v. Miller
75 A.D.3d 153 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
Suphankomut v. Chi-Teh Yu
66 A.D.3d 1360 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
Moss v. McKelvey
32 A.D.3d 1281 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Vargas v. Villa Josefa Realty Corp.
28 A.D.3d 389 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Curto v. Zittel's Dairy Farm
23 A.D.3d 1055 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2005)
Matter of City of New York
2004 NY Slip Op 50052(U) (New York Supreme Court, Kings County, 2004)
Perla v. Wilson
287 A.D.2d 606 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
283 A.D.2d 935, 725 N.Y.S.2d 256, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4602, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aviles-v-938-scy-ltd-nyappdiv-2001.