Aviation Training Corp. v. Gargiulo
This text of 184 Misc. 198 (Aviation Training Corp. v. Gargiulo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
A triable issue of fact is presented as to whether the defendant signed as a party to the contract in the sense of being bound thereby, or whether he merely signed in the belief his approval to his son’s signing the contract, because of nonage, was required. It was error, therefore, to treat the defense as sham and to grant summary judgment.
The judgment and order should be reversed, with $10 costs to appellant to abide the event, and motion denied.
Hammer, McLaughlin and Eder, JJ., concur.
Judgment and order reversed, etc.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
184 Misc. 198, 53 N.Y.S.2d 141, 1945 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2864, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/aviation-training-corp-v-gargiulo-nysupct-1945.