Avetco, Inc. v. Sentinel Insurance Company, Ltd.

CourtDistrict Court, C.D. California
DecidedAugust 16, 2024
Docket2:23-cv-07244
StatusUnknown

This text of Avetco, Inc. v. Sentinel Insurance Company, Ltd. (Avetco, Inc. v. Sentinel Insurance Company, Ltd.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, C.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Avetco, Inc. v. Sentinel Insurance Company, Ltd., (C.D. Cal. 2024).

Opinion

E-mail: andy.downs@bullivant.com 2 Ann K. Johnston, SBN 145022 3 E-mail: ann.johnston@bullivant.com Ted A. Smith, SBN 159986 4 E-mail: ted.smith@bullivant.com 5 BULLIVANT HOUSER BAILEY PC 101 Montgomery Street, Suite 2600 6 San Francisco, CA 94104 7 Telephone: 415.352.2700 Facsimile: 415.352.2701 8

9 Attorneys for Defendant Sentinel Insurance Company, Ltd. 10 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 WESTERN DIVISION 14 AVETCO, INC., a California Case No.: 2:23-cv-07244-SPG-AJR corporation, 15 16 Plaintiff, [PROPOSED] STIPULATED 17 v. PROTECTIVE ORDER

18 SENTINEL INSURANCE COMPANY 19 LTD. dba THE HARTFORD, a 20 Connecticut corporation; and DOES 1- 50, inclusive, 21

22 Defendants.

24 25 1. GENERAL 26 1.1 Purposes and Limitations. Discovery in this action is likely to 27 involve production of confidential, proprietary, or private information for which 28 special protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than 2 stipulate to and petition the Court to enter the following Stipulated Protective 3 Order. The parties acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket 4 protections on all disclosures or responses to discovery and that the protection it 5 affords from public disclosure and use extends only to the limited information or 6 items that are entitled to confidential treatment under the applicable legal 7 principles. The parties further acknowledge, as set forth in Section 12.3, below, 8 that this Stipulated Protective Order does not entitle them to file confidential 9 information under seal; Civil Local Rule 79-5 sets forth the procedures that must 10 be followed and the standards that will be applied when a party seeks permission 11 from the court to file material under seal. 12 1.2 Good Cause Statement. 13 This action is likely to involve trade secrets, customer and pricing lists and 14 other valuable research, development, commercial, financial, technical and/or 15 proprietary information for which special protection from public disclosure and 16 from use for any purpose other than prosecution of this action is warranted. In 17 addition, this action involves documents for which a party has asserted the 18 attorney client and attorney work product privilege, the application of which the 19 other party contests. Such confidential, privileged, and proprietary materials and 20 information consist of, among other things, confidential business or financial 21 information, privileged communications between attorneys and their consultant, 22 information regarding confidential business practices, or other confidential 23 research, development, or commercial information (including information 24 implicating privacy rights of third parties), information otherwise generally 25 unavailable to the public, or which may be privileged or otherwise protected from 26 disclosure under state or federal statutes, court rules, case decisions, or common 27 law. Accordingly, to expedite the flow of information, to facilitate the prompt 28 resolution of disputes over confidentiality of discovery materials, to adequately 2 parties are permitted reasonable necessary uses of such material in preparation for 3 and in the conduct of trial, to address their handling at the end of the litigation, and 4 serve the ends of justice, a protective order for such information is justified in this 5 matter. It is the intent of the parties that information will not be designated as 6 confidential for tactical reasons and that nothing be so designated without a good 7 faith belief that it has been maintained in a confidential, non-public manner, and 8 there is good cause why it should not be part of the public record of this case. 9 2. DEFINITIONS 10 2.1 Action: Avetco, Inc. v. Sentinel Insurance Company Ltd. dba The 11 Hartford, et al., USDC, Central District of California, Case No. 2:23-cv-07244- 12 SPG-AJR 13 2.2 Challenging Party: a Party or Non-Party that challenges the 14 designation of information or items under this Order. 15 2.3 “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items: information (regardless of 16 how it is generated, stored or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for 17 protection under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c), and as specified above in 18 the Good Cause Statement. 19 2.4 Counsel: Outside Counsel of Record and House Counsel (as well as 20 their support staff). 21 2.5 Designating Party: a Party or Non-Party that designates information 22 or items that it produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as 23 “CONFIDENTIAL.” 24 2.6 Disclosure or Discovery Material: all items or information, 25 regardless of the medium or manner in which it is generated, stored, or maintained 26 (including, among other things, testimony, transcripts, and tangible things), that 27 are produced or generated in disclosures or responses to discovery in this matter. 28 2.7 Expert: a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a 2 serve as an expert witness or as a consultant in this Action. 3 2.8 House Counsel: attorneys who are employees of a party to this 4 Action. House Counsel does not include Outside Counsel of Record or any other 5 outside counsel. 6 2.9 Non-Party: any natural person, partnership, corporation, association, 7 or other legal entity not named as a Party to this action. 8 2.10 Outside Counsel of Record: attorneys who are not employees of a 9 party to this Action but are retained to represent or advise a party to this Action 10 and have appeared in this Action on behalf of that party or are affiliated with a law 11 firm that has appeared on behalf of that party, including support staff. 12 2.11 Party: any party to this Action, including all of its officers, directors, 13 employees, consultants, retained experts, and Outside Counsel of Record (and 14 their support staffs). 15 2.12 Producing Party: a Party or Non-Party that produces Disclosure or 16 Discovery Material in this Action. 17 2.13 Professional Vendors: persons or entities that provide litigation 18 support services (e.g., photocopying, videotaping, translating, preparing exhibits 19 or demonstrations, and organizing, storing, or retrieving data in any form or 20 medium) and their employees and subcontractors. 21 2.14 Protected Material: any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is 22 designated as “CONFIDENTIAL.” 23 2.15 Receiving Party: a Party that receives Disclosure or Discovery 24 Material from a Producing Party. 25 3. SCOPE 26 The protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order cover not only 27 Protected Material (as defined above), but also (1) any information copied or 28 extracted from Protected Material; (2) all copies, excerpts, summaries, or 2 presentations by Parties or their Counsel that might reveal Protected Material. 3 Any use of Protected Material at trial shall be governed by the orders of the 4 trial judge. This Order does not govern the use of Protected Material at trial. 5 4. DURATION 6 Once a case proceeds to trial, all of the court-filed information to be 7 introduced that was previously designated as confidential or maintained pursuant 8 to this protective order becomes public and will be presumptively available to all 9 members of the public, including the press, unless compelling reasons supported 10 by specific factual findings to proceed otherwise are made to the trial judge in 11 advance of the trial. See Kamakana v. City and Cty. of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 12 1180-81 (9th Cir. 2006) (distinguishing “good cause” showing for sealing 13 documents produced in discovery from “compelling reasons” standard when 14 merits-related documents are part of court record). Accordingly, the terms of this 15 protective order do not extend beyond the commencement of the trial. 16 5. DESIGNATING PROTECTED MATERIAL 17 5.1 Exercise of Restraint and Care in Designating Material for Protection.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Latimer v. Groetzinger
21 A. 22 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1891)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Avetco, Inc. v. Sentinel Insurance Company, Ltd., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/avetco-inc-v-sentinel-insurance-company-ltd-cacd-2024.