Avery v. Ward
This text of 911 S.W.2d 578 (Avery v. Ward) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In response to appellee’s motion for disqualification, Justices Robert H. Dudley, Tom Glaze, and Donald Corbin recuse but not for any of the reasons set out in his motion. Appellee’s attorney, J. L. Wilson, was sanctioned in federal court as a result of a criminal conviction and is now the subject of disciplinary proceedings before the State Professional Conduct Committee and disbarment proceedings before the Phillips County Circuit Court which have been remanded to federal court. Because these named justices intend to seek Rule 11 sanctions to be imposed against attorney J. L. Wilson and his attorneys for filing a no-merit petition in federal court, we recuse.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
911 S.W.2d 578, 322 Ark. 669, 1995 Ark. LEXIS 707, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/avery-v-ward-ark-1995.