Avery v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims·Decided May 1, 2018·No. 18-599·Unpublished

Opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims

NO. 18- 599C (Filed: May 1, 2018) FILED ) MAY - l 2013 DAVID A- AVERY= ) u.s. couRT oF ) FEDERAL CLA|MS Plaimifr, ) ) v. ) ) CORECIVIC, INC., ) ) Defendant. ) ) DISMISSAL ORDER

Plaintiff is incarcerated at the Trousdale Turner Correctional Center in Hartsville, Tennessee. He is proceeding pro se in this civil action against CoreCivic, Inc., a prison management contractor. No filing fee has been paid. The claims in the complaint include “false imprison [ment],” “exploitation of the injured party’s private property,” and “unauthorized use of DAVID ANTHONY AVERY.” Compl. at 2-3.

The only proper defendant in this court is the United States. United States v. Sherwood, 312 U.S. 584, 588 (1941) (citations omitted). This court has no jurisdiction over plaintiffs claims against CoreCivic, Inc.l The clerl<’s office is directed to ENTER final judgment DISMISSING the complaint for lack of jurisdiction, Without prejudice

IT IS SO ORDERED.

HPWQQYQ.LP iQQ/Vl ehan

L>ATRICIA E. CAMPBELL sMrrH

udge

' Even if the complaint could be construed to include claims against the government entity that contracts With CoreCivic, Inc., that entity is the State of Tennessee, not the United States.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Avery v. United States, (uscfc 2018).

Avery v. United States (Avery v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Sherwood
312 U.S. 584 (Supreme Court, 1941)