Avery v. United States
Opinion
In the United States Court of Federal Claims
NO. 18- 599C (Filed: May 1, 2018) FILED ) MAY - l 2013 DAVID A- AVERY= ) u.s. couRT oF ) FEDERAL CLA|MS Plaimifr, ) ) v. ) ) CORECIVIC, INC., ) ) Defendant. ) ) DISMISSAL ORDER
Plaintiff is incarcerated at the Trousdale Turner Correctional Center in Hartsville, Tennessee. He is proceeding pro se in this civil action against CoreCivic, Inc., a prison management contractor. No filing fee has been paid. The claims in the complaint include “false imprison [ment],” “exploitation of the injured party’s private property,” and “unauthorized use of DAVID ANTHONY AVERY.” Compl. at 2-3.
The only proper defendant in this court is the United States. United States v. Sherwood, 312 U.S. 584, 588 (1941) (citations omitted). This court has no jurisdiction over plaintiffs claims against CoreCivic, Inc.l The clerl<’s office is directed to ENTER final judgment DISMISSING the complaint for lack of jurisdiction, Without prejudice
IT IS SO ORDERED.
HPWQQYQ.LP iQQ/Vl ehan
L>ATRICIA E. CAMPBELL sMrrH
udge
' Even if the complaint could be construed to include claims against the government entity that contracts With CoreCivic, Inc., that entity is the State of Tennessee, not the United States.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Avery v. United States (Avery v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.