Avery v. Samuels

195 S.E. 437, 185 Ga. 514, 1938 Ga. LEXIS 462
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedFebruary 18, 1938
DocketNo. 12156
StatusPublished

This text of 195 S.E. 437 (Avery v. Samuels) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Avery v. Samuels, 195 S.E. 437, 185 Ga. 514, 1938 Ga. LEXIS 462 (Ga. 1938).

Opinion

Grice, Justice.

1. The equity in the petition, if any, consisted in an allegation that the defendants had in their possession the identical money of which the plaintiff was defrauded; and secondly, that a third party, the custodian of the money, would, unless enjoined, deliver the same to other persons, in a certain contingency. The proof failed to support either allegation.

[516]*5162. The evidence likewise failed to show what part of the money-found in the possession of Mary Avery was the property of John Avery, there being no proof to show that all the money found on the person of Mary should go to discharge a debt of John’s.

3. It follows that the verdict is without evidence to support it. The. judgment refusing a new trial must be

Reversed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
195 S.E. 437, 185 Ga. 514, 1938 Ga. LEXIS 462, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/avery-v-samuels-ga-1938.