Avery v. City of West Haven

Second Circuit

Avery v. City of West Haven

33 F. App'x 21

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedApril 30, 2002

DocketDocket No. 01-7268

StatusPublished

This text of 33 F. App'x 21 (Avery v. City of West Haven) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Avery v. City of West Haven, 33 F. App'x 21 (2d Cir. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

SUMMARY ORDER

UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the judgment of the district court be AFFIRMED.

Appellants challenge the district court’s grant of summary judgment, dismissing their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 retaliation claim. On the facts that must be deemed uncontroverted, given the failure of the appellants to file a statement of disputed material facts as required by Local Rule 9(c)(2) in response to appellees’ 9(c)(1) Statement of Undisputed Material Facts, no First Amendment retaliation claim can be made out.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SUMMARY ORDER

UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the judgment of the district court be AFFIRMED.

Appellants challenge the district court’s grant of summary judgment, dismissing their 42 U.S.C. § 1983 retaliation claim. On the facts that must be deemed uncontroverted, given the failure of the appellants to file a statement of disputed material facts as required by Local Rule 9(c)(2) in response to appellees’ 9(c)(1) Statement of Undisputed Material Facts, no First Amendment retaliation claim can be made out.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

33 F. App'x 21, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/avery-v-city-of-west-haven-ca2-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack