Avery v. Avery

162 S.E.2d 718, 224 Ga. 516, 1968 Ga. LEXIS 842
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJuly 16, 1968
Docket24754
StatusPublished
Cited by12 cases

This text of 162 S.E.2d 718 (Avery v. Avery) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Avery v. Avery, 162 S.E.2d 718, 224 Ga. 516, 1968 Ga. LEXIS 842 (Ga. 1968).

Opinion

Undercofler, Justice.

On March 30; 1968, Geneva L. Avery filed a complaint in the Superior Court of Carroll County, seeking to have a divorce decree obtained by her former husband on November 17, 1967, set aside. She alleges that when the divorce case was called for trial, her counsel was providentially prevented from attending court; that she immediately sought other counsel to represent her in the proceedings *517 but that a judgment had already been obtained by her husband before she and her newly employed counsel arrived at the courthouse on the date of the judgment; that she has a good defense to the divorce action; and that she is entitled to part of the property of the parties.

Argued July 8, 1968 Decided July 16, 1968. C. C. Perkins, for appellant. Henry C. Head, Gilbert & Head, for appellee.

At a hearing the trial judge entered the following order: “The within matter coming on to be heard and after hearing evidence in said matter it appears that the plaintiff failed to prove the allegations of her petition, it is therefore on motion of the defendant, considered, ordered and adjudged that the complaint be and the same is hereby dismissed with prejudice. . .”

In his notice of appeal the attorney for the appellant stated that a transcript of evidence and proceedings would not be filed for inclusion in the record. The appellant enumerates as error the quoted judgment of the trial court. Held:

This court is a court for the correction of errors only and where consideration of the errors enumerated is dependent on the transcript of evidence and proceedings this court has nothing to review without such transcript. Brown v. State, 223 Ga. 540 (156 SE2d 454).

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Drake v. Drake
632 S.E.2d 165 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2006)
Borg-Warner Health Products, Inc. v. May
268 S.E.2d 770 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1980)
Satterfield v. Satterfield
223 S.E.2d 136 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1976)
Davis v. Davis
209 S.E.2d 187 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1974)
Tolbert v. Tolbert
206 S.E.2d 63 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1974)
Master Mortgage Corp. v. Craven
193 S.E.2d 567 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1972)
Lamb Bros. v. Industrial Credit Co.
184 S.E.2d 585 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1971)
Thomas v. Thomas
182 S.E.2d 438 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1971)
Nichols v. Love
182 S.E.2d 439 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1971)
Georgia Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. Coleman
174 S.E.2d 351 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1970)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
162 S.E.2d 718, 224 Ga. 516, 1968 Ga. LEXIS 842, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/avery-v-avery-ga-1968.