Avert v. Jacob

The Superior Court of New York City

Avert v. Jacob

38 N.Y. St. Rep. 1026

CourtThe Superior Court of New York City

DecidedMay 4, 1891

StatusPublished

This text of 38 N.Y. St. Rep. 1026 (Avert v. Jacob) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of New York City primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Avert v. Jacob, 38 N.Y. St. Rep. 1026 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1891).

Pincite

Opinion

Freedman, J.

The questions presented by the appeal bring the facts which are complicated. There is no controversy as to the law applicable to the case. The facts, and all questions arising thereon, have been fully discussed by the referee in an elaborate opinion, and a careful examination of the whole case has failed to disclose any error committed by him.

The judgment should be affirmed, with costs, on the opinion of the referee.

Sedgwick, Oh. J., and McAdam, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Freedman, J.

The questions presented by the appeal bring the facts which are complicated. There is no controversy as to the law applicable to the case. The facts, and all questions arising thereon, have been fully discussed by the referee in an elaborate opinion, and a careful examination of the whole case has failed to disclose any error committed by him.

The judgment should be affirmed, with costs, on the opinion of the referee.

Sedgwick, Oh. J., and McAdam, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

38 N.Y. St. Rep. 1026, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/avert-v-jacob-nysuperctnyc-1891.