Avert v. Jacob

The Superior Court of New York City

Avert v. Jacob

38 N.Y. St. Rep. 1026

The Superior Court of New York City·Decided May 4, 1891·Published

Opinion

Freedman, J.

The questions presented by the appeal bring the facts which are complicated. There is no controversy as to the law applicable to the case. The facts, and all questions arising thereon, have been fully discussed by the referee in an elaborate opinion, and a careful examination of the whole case has failed to disclose any error committed by him.

The judgment should be affirmed, with costs, on the opinion of the referee.

Sedgwick, Oh. J., and McAdam, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Freedman, J.

The questions presented by the appeal bring the facts which are complicated. There is no controversy as to the law applicable to the case. The facts, and all questions arising thereon, have been fully discussed by the referee in an elaborate opinion, and a careful examination of the whole case has failed to disclose any error committed by him.

The judgment should be affirmed, with costs, on the opinion of the referee.

Sedgwick, Oh. J., and McAdam, J., concur.

Avert v. Jacob, 38 N.Y. St. Rep. 1026 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1891).

Pincite

38 N.Y. St. Rep. 1026 (Avert v. Jacob) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.