Averill v. Northwestern National Ins.

Supreme Court

Averill v. Northwestern National Ins.

284 U.S. 590, 52 S. Ct. 139

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedDecember 14, 1931

DocketNo. 165

StatusPublished

This text of 284 U.S. 590 (Averill v. Northwestern National Ins.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Averill v. Northwestern National Ins., 284 U.S. 590, 52 S. Ct. 139 (1931).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The order granting an interlocutory injunction is affirmed (Alabama v. United States, 279 U. S. 229, 231) without prejudice to further con[591]*591sideration of the merits of the cause, and without prejudice to the power and duty of the District Court, as specially constituted, to inquire and determine whether the court has jurisdiction, both in relation to the amount involved in the controversy and with respect to the right of the complainant to' maintain this suit in equity.

Mr. I. H. Van Winkle, Attorney General of Oregon, with whom Mr. Willis S. Moore, Assistant Attorney General, was on the brief, for appellant. Mr. Thomas MacMahon, with whom Mr. Guy E. Kelly was on the brief, for appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

The order granting an interlocutory injunction is affirmed (Alabama v. United States, 279 U. S. 229, 231) without prejudice to further con[591]*591sideration of the merits of the cause, and without prejudice to the power and duty of the District Court, as specially constituted, to inquire and determine whether the court has jurisdiction, both in relation to the amount involved in the controversy and with respect to the right of the complainant to' maintain this suit in equity.

Mr. I. H. Van Winkle, Attorney General of Oregon, with whom Mr. Willis S. Moore, Assistant Attorney General, was on the brief, for appellant. Mr. Thomas MacMahon, with whom Mr. Guy E. Kelly was on the brief, for appellee.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

284 U.S. 590, 52 S. Ct. 139, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/averill-v-northwestern-national-ins-scotus-1931.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack