Averill v. Gould

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Averill v. Gould

29 N.E.2d 133, 299 Mass. 615, 1938 Mass. LEXIS 1126

CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

DecidedFebruary 10, 1938

StatusPublished

This text of 29 N.E.2d 133 (Averill v. Gould) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Averill v. Gould, 29 N.E.2d 133, 299 Mass. 615, 1938 Mass. LEXIS 1126 (Mass. 1938).

Pincite

Opinion

There is no sufficient ground for granting the motion to remand. -The record in this case is an appeal in ordinary form from a decree dismissing a petition for administration upon the estate of Deborah Taylor Sweeney Wildes Poole. There is no report of material facts. The evidence is not reported. It is a bald record of papers natural in such a petition. No question is raised for our consideration. Jordan v. Ulmer, 237 Mass. 577.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

There is no sufficient ground for granting the motion to remand. -The record in this case is an appeal in ordinary form from a decree dismissing a petition for administration upon the estate of Deborah Taylor Sweeney Wildes Poole. There is no report of material facts. The evidence is not reported. It is a bald record of papers natural in such a petition. No question is raised for our consideration. Jordan v. Ulmer, 237 Mass. 577.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

29 N.E.2d 133, 299 Mass. 615, 1938 Mass. LEXIS 1126, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/averill-v-gould-mass-1938.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack