Averill v. Benzie County State Savings Bank

106 N.W. 865, 143 Mich. 306, 1906 Mich. LEXIS 639
CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 5, 1906
DocketDocket No. 127
StatusPublished

This text of 106 N.W. 865 (Averill v. Benzie County State Savings Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Averill v. Benzie County State Savings Bank, 106 N.W. 865, 143 Mich. 306, 1906 Mich. LEXIS 639 (Mich. 1906).

Opinion

Montgomery, J.

This is a bill filed to set aside a levy and sale of two lots in the village of Frankfort, which are claimed to constitute a part of complainants’ homestead. Complainant Lorenzo Averill owned and occupied lots 1, 2, and 3 of block 13. The lots are all in one inclosure; the house being on lot 2, and the barn and chicken coop on lot 3. Complainants occupied the premises when the levy was made. The value of lot 2 was probably not in excess of $1,400.

The single question is whether the lots should have been treated as one by the sheriff, and proceedings taken under sections 10364-10366, 3 Comp. Laws. We think this was complainants’ right. Geiges v. Greiner, 68 Mich. 153; King v. Welborn, 83 Mich. 195 (9 L. R. A. 803); Lamont v. Le Fevre, 96 Mich. 175.

The decree is reversed, and a decree will be entered in this court for complainants, with costs of both courts.

McAlvay, Blair, Ostrander, and Hooker, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Geiges v. Greiner
36 N.W. 48 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1888)
King v. Welborn
9 L.R.A. 803 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1890)
Lamont v. LeFevre
55 N.W. 687 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1893)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
106 N.W. 865, 143 Mich. 306, 1906 Mich. LEXIS 639, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/averill-v-benzie-county-state-savings-bank-mich-1906.