Averbuck v. Becher

134 N.Y.S. 1112

This text of 134 N.Y.S. 1112 (Averbuck v. Becher) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Averbuck v. Becher, 134 N.Y.S. 1112 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1912).

Opinion

GERARD, J.

Action on a promissory note. The defendant set up an affirmative defense that an agreement was entered into by plaintiff to exchange the note on which he sued for two notes, and to release the maker and indorser of the note on which he sued. The learned court below charged the jury that the plaintiff—

“must satisfy you by a fair preponderance of the evidence that this note for $150 was never paid, and that no agreement had been made that it should be paid by the acceptance of these two notes.”

This, of course, was error. The burden was on defendant to prove the affirmative defense.

Judgment reversed, and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
134 N.Y.S. 1112, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/averbuck-v-becher-nyappterm-1912.