Avera v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Avera v. State

128 S.E. 587, 34 Ga. App. 150, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 95

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJune 9, 1925

Docket16494; 16495; 16496; 16497

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 128 S.E. 587 (Avera v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Avera v. State, 128 S.E. 587, 34 Ga. App. 150, 1925 Ga. App. LEXIS 95 (Ga. Ct. App. 1925).

Pincite

Opinion

Luke, J.

1. Where the motion to change the venue in a criminal case is based solely upon the ground that an impartial jury can not be obtained in the county where the alleged crime was committed, and the motion is denied by the trial judge, a direct bill of exceptions to that judgment will not lie. Coleman v. George, 140 Ga. 619 (2) (79 S. E. 543); Brannon v. State, 147 Ga. 499 (1) (94 S. E. 759).

2. Under the above ruling the bills of exceptions in these four eases must be dismissed.

Writs of error dismissed.

Broyles, O. J., and Bloodworih, J., concur. W. A. McClellan, W. 0. Cooper Jr., J. W. Bloodworth, for plaintiffs in error. Charles H. Garrett, solicitor-general, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI