Avera v. Southern Mortgage Co.
This text of 92 S.E. 533 (Avera v. Southern Mortgage Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. As an abstract principle of law, it was error to reject certain voluntary deeds, which had been recorded. But the error was harmless, since the record of a voluntary deed is not notice to an innocent third person who acquires for a valuable consideration a contract lien against the property. Actual notice is required by law, in order to give priority to a voluntary deed. Fleming v. Townsend, 6 Ga. 104 (50 Am. D. 318); Fowler v. Waldrip, 10 Ga. 350; Finch v. Woods, 113 Ga. 996 (39 S. E. 418) ; Civil Code (1910), § 4198.
2. Under the facts of this case, the court did not err in directing a.verdict for the plaintiff.
Judgment affirnied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
92 S.E. 533, 147 Ga. 24, 1917 Ga. LEXIS 27, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/avera-v-southern-mortgage-co-ga-1917.